Japanese hands was Randle. After the war he succeeded in reaching Australia and bummed his way around there till a few months ago. He must have known his father was dead but the old man was a bit of a miser. No one thought he had more than a few hundred pounds to leave and I suppose Rafter didnât think it worth while admitting his identity for that. His collaboration was rather a famous one in its way. He might even have been charged with war crimes.â
âOr treason.â
âThen I suppose he got news of what had happened or he was desperate. At all events he came home. Reached London two weeks before he came down to Selby.â
âOh. Two weeks. Then he may have been in communication with the family?â
âThey all deny this. They all say they had heard or seen nothing to make them doubt that he was dead. He certainly went to Somerset House and saw his fatherâs will. He came down to Selby on the 4.15 that day and put up at the Queen Victoria. He went into the bar, knocked back half a dozen doubles and told one of the barmaids he had been presumed dead and that his âresurrectionâ would not be welcomed by certain people in the town. Then, although it was a beastly night with a cold wind, he insisted on taking a walk on the promenade.â
âThere is nothing to suggest that he had spoken to any of the family then?â
âNothing. He asked to use the telephone and came back to the bar to say he could not get through. His movements otherwise donât leave much opportunity. His train got in on time at 5.40 and he went straight to the Queen Victoria. He went up to his room for a wash and was in the bar by half past six or so. He did not leave it, except when he tried to telephone, till 9.30 or thereabouts. Then he walked straight down to the promenade, passing a man on his beat at about twenty to ten. At 10.50 our man found him dead in the farthest shelterâright at the end of the promenade.â
âHad he got his wits about him, this man of yours?â
Moore smiled.
âAn enthusiast, anyway. Rather turned his head, having found the corpse. Sitwell, his name is and heâs still in his early twenties. Thinks Iâm pretty unappreciative. But he seems to have got his times right, which is the main thing.â
âI gather it was done with a sledge hammer.â
âOh no. Thatâs press exaggeration. It was a good heavy hammer such as is used for breaking coal, but not so big that it could not have been carried to the place unnoticeably by man or woman. Itâs the sort of thing that might be found in any house. Nothing of the sort has been reported missing or stolen. Weâre unlikely to trace its ownership, for it might be ten years old or more and thousands of them are sold all over the country.â
âFinger prints?â
âNot one.â
âAnything left anywhere near the body?â
âNothing really. The technical boys have got some threads and particles, I believe, but they could only be any use as additional evidence if we had our man, and would be dubious then. Rafter apparently never took his hands out of his pockets so he wasnât clutching that traditional piece of cloth. Once weâve found someone itis possible that the microscope will help, but it tells us nothing useful now.â
âIs it certain that the man had been killed with the hammer?â
âAs far as expert opinion goes, yes.â
âAt least youâve got the time narrowed down nicely. How far was it from where Rafter passed the policeman to the shelter?â
âAt the most fifteen minutesâ walk for a man with drink in him and the wind against him. It could be done in ten.â
âSo the earliest possible time, if your man is accurate, is 9.50. And the latest, say 10.40. Thatâs a very small margin, John.â
âYes. But whatâs the good of it?â
âDo you know who was along that part of