Read The Source Field Investigations for Free Online Page B

is hidden in these spiraling forces. Aluminum is used in electronics at the component level due to its extremely light weight—and many components are also then coated in plastic. Therefore, digital watches and highly accurate laboratory clocks are not likely to respond to changes in the flow of time in a noticeable way. However, in 1993 Dr. Bruce DePalma found that the Accutron watch, which runs on a metallic tuning fork, does speed up and slow down in the presence of these fields. 14
    In 2001, Dr. Hartmut Müller 15 used the spin fields within gravity to make a telephone call from the Toezler Medientage building in Germany to Saint Petersburg in Russia. No electromagnetic fields were ever used to make this call—just as Backster’s plants, bacteria, insects, animals and human cells could “talk” to each other while they were in shielded rooms. You can call from deep inside a concrete parking garage, at the bottom of the ocean or halfway across the galaxy, and you will always get a perfect real-time signal. Müller’s discovery also does not create “electromagnetic smog” that can cause cancer, headaches and other problems, 16 and this technology could be easily adapted for wireless Internet access—using the same systems preferred by biological life.

Astrophysical Observations
    Some scientists who have studied Kozyrev’s material are willing to consider that something significant is going on, but they’re not comfortable with the idea that these effects are actually caused by the flow of time. This brings us to one of the most fascinating areas Kozyrev studied—namely astronomy. Kozyrev believed that “stars are machines” that get their energy from the time flow—and he found very compelling evidence to prove it. As Levich wrote in 1996, most of Kozyrev’s experiments in the later years of his life were “dedicated to direct detection . . . of non-electromagnetic [energy] flows from planets, stars, galaxies, stellar clusters and nebulae.” 17
    What exactly does this mean? Beginning in the mid-1950s, Kozyrev designed a special type of telescope that had one of his time flow detectors located right at the focal point. As strange as this sounds, he could put a metal plate in front of the telescope—blocking out all visible light and all electromagnetic radiation—but the time-flow detector still picked up a measurable signal when he aimed the telescope at a star, or any other celestial object. This could not be possible unless he was detecting an energy that was not electromagnetic—and had nothing to do with visible light.
    The light from a star can take many millions of years to reach us—and in the meantime, the real position of the star has actually drifted somewhere else. So when we look at the night sky, we are looking at the past. Kozyrev found that if he aimed his telescope at the true position of a star, which could be estimated through various means, the signal was much stronger. 18 This suggested that the waves within the Source Field traveled much, much faster than the speed of light—effectively instantaneously.
    And if that isn’t already confusing enough, Kozyrev could then look at where the star would likely end up in the future, and he detected energy coming from that position as well. I know—it sounds totally crazy, but when you get new data that is strange, that doesn’t mean we throw it away. Instead, we try to understand what the heck is going on, and explain the data. Obviously, as I’m sure you can see, the comfortable, old-fashioned notion of linear time simply can’t hold up in light of this new evidence, if Kozyrev is actually right.
    Indeed, the strongest energy from a star or celestial object came from its true position—defeating Einstein’s belief that no energy field could ever travel faster than the speed of light. A star’s energy then got steadily weaker when you moved toward its position in the past, and weaker when you moved the telescope toward its