particular
minority, they might have told his story very differently—and
with considerably more historical plausibility. They might have
told it, for example, in traditional patriotic style, as the story of
an inspired Jewish holy man martyred by Israel’s traditional
enemies, foreign oppressors of one sort or another. The biblical
book of Daniel, for example, which tells the story of the prophet
Daniel, who, although threatened with a horrible death—being
torn apart by lions—nevertheless defies the king of Babylon in
the name of God and of the people of Israel (Dan. 6:1-28). The
first book of Maccabees tells the story of the priest Mattathias,
who defies Syrian soldiers when they order him to worship
idols. Mattathias chooses to die rather than betray his devotion
to God.23
THE GOSPEL OF MARK AND THE JEWISH WAR / 15
But unlike the authors of Daniel or 1 Maccabees, the gospel
writers chose to dissociate themselves from the Jewish majority
and to focus instead upon intra-Jewish conflict—specifically
upon their own quarrel with those who resisted their claims that
Jesus was the Messiah. Within the gospels, as we shall see, the
figure of Satan tends to express this dramatic shift of blame from
“the nations”— bagoyim , in Hebrew—onto members of Jesus’
own people. The variation in each gospel as it depicts the activity
of the demonic opposition—that is, those perceived as enemies—
expresses, I believe, a variety of relationships, often deeply
ambivalent, between various groups of Jesus’ followers and the
specific Jewish groups each writer regards as his primary
opponents. I want to avoid oversimplification. Nonetheless it is
probably fair to say that in every case the decision to place the
story of Jesus within the context of God's struggle against Satan
tends to minimize the role of the Romans, and to place
increasing blame instead upon Jesus’ Jewish enemies.
This is not to say that the gospel writers simply intended to
exonerate the Romans. Mark surely was aware that during his
time, and for some thirty years after the war, the Romans
remained wary of renewed sedition. Members of a group loyal to
a condemned seditionist were at risk, and Mark probably hoped
to persuade those outsiders who might read his account that
neither Jesus nor his followers offered any threat to Roman
order. But within Mark’s account, the Romans, even the few
portrayed with some sympathy, remain essentially outsiders.
Mark tells the story of Jesus in the context that matters to him
most—within the Jewish community. And here, as in most
human situations, the more intimate the conflict, the more
intense and bitter it becomes.
Mark opens his narrative with the account of John's baptizing
Jesus and relates that at the moment of baptism the power of
God descended upon Jesus, and “a voice spoke from heaven,
saying ‘This is my beloved son’ ” (1:11). At that moment, all
human beings disappear from Mark’s narrative and, as we have
seen, the spirit of God drives Jesus into the wilderness to
encounter Satan, wild animals, and angels. Recounting this
episode, as James Robinson notes, Mark does not depart from
events in the human,
16 / THE ORIGIN OF SATAN
historical world but signals that he wants to relate these events
to the struggle between good and evil in the universe.24 Mark’s
account, then, moves direcdy from Jesus’ solitary struggle with
Satan in the desert to his first public appearance in the synagogue
at Capernaum, where immediately on the Sabbath he entered the
synagogue and taught.
And they were astonished at his teaching, for he taught as one
who had authority, and not as the scribes (1:22).
There Jesus encounters a man possessed by an evil spirit who,
sensing Jesus’ divine power, challenges him: “What have you to
do with us, Jesus of Nazareth? Have you come to destroy us?”
(1:24). According to Mark, Jesus has come to heal the world