the
standard of purity that Essenes held sacred. Instead of separating
himself from people who polluted themselves by “walking in
the ways of the Gentiles” ( Jubilees 1:9), Jesus chose for one of his
disciples a tax collector—a class that other Jews detested as
profiteers who collaborated with the hated Romans. Indeed,
Mark says, “There were many tax collectors who followed him”
(2:15). Instead of fasting, like other devout Jews, Jesus ate and
drank freely. And instead of scrupulously observing Sabbath
laws, Jesus excused his disciples when they broke them:
One Sabbath he was going through the grainfields; and as they
made their way, his disciples began to pick ears of grain. And
the Pharisees said to him, “Look, why are they doing what is
not lawful on the Sabbath?” And he said to them, “Have you
never read what David did, when he was in need and was
hungry, he and those who were with him: how he entered the
house of God . . . and ate the sacred bread,. . . and also gave it to
those who were with him?” (2:23-26).
Here Jesus dares claim, as precedent for his disciples’
apparently casual action, the prerogative of King David himself,
who, with his men, broke the sacred food laws during a wartime
emergency.
Claiming divine and royal power while simultaneously
violating the purity laws, Jesus, at the beginning of his public
activity,
THE GOSPEL OF MARK AND THE JEWISH WAR / 19
outrages virtually every party among his contemporaries, from
the disciples of John the Baptist to the scribes and Pharisees.
The next time Jesus entered the synagogue on a Sabbath, Mark
says,
a man was there who had a withered hand. And they watched
him, to see whether he would heal him on the Sabbath, so that
they might accuse him. And he said to the man who had the
withered hand, “Come here.” And he said to them, “Is it
lawful on the Sabbath to do good or to do harm, to save life or
to kill?” But they were silent. And he looked around at them
with anger, grieved at their hardness of heart, and said to the
man, “Stretch out your hand.” He stretched it out, and his
hand was restored (3:1-5).
Instead of postponing the healing for a day, Jesus had chosen
deliberately to defy his critics by performing it on the Sabbath.
Seeing this, Mark says:
The Pharisees went out, and immediately conspired against
him with the Herodians [the party of King Herod], how they
might kill him (3:6).
For Mark the secret meaning of such conflict is clear. Those
who are offended and outraged by Jesus’ actions do not know
that Jesus is impelled by God’s spirit to contend against the
forces of evil, whether those forces manifest themselves in the
invisible demonic presences who infect and possess people, or in
his actual human opponents. When the Pharisees and Herodians
conspire to kill Jesus, they themselves, Mark suggests, are acting
as agents of evil. As Mark tells the story, Jesus has barely
engaged Satan’s power before his opponents “conspired . . . how
they might kill him” (3:6).
Mark suggests that Jesus recognizes that the leaders who
oppose him are energized by unseen forces. Immediately after
this powerful coalition has united against him, Jesus retaliates by
commissioning a new leadership group, “the twelve,” presum-
20 / THE ORIGIN OF SATAN
ably assigning one leader for each of the original twelve tribes of
Israel. Jesus orders them to preach and gives them “power to cast
out demons” (3:13).
This escalation of spiritual conflict immediately evokes
escalating opposition—opposition that begins at home, within
Jesus’ own family. Mark says that when Jesus “went home ... his
family . . . went out to seize him, for they said, ‘He is insane [or:
beside himself]’ ” (3:21 ).26 Next “the scribes who came down
from Jerusalem” charge that Jesus himself “is possessed by
Beelzebub; by the prince of demons he casts out demons” (3:22).
Jesus
Kiki Swinson presents Unique