across the treacherous regions of our psyches.
Would we ever need ritual festivities if there wasnât also something to be sad about? ABar Mitzvah ceremony, New York State. ( illustration credit 2.16 )
In essence, religions understand that to belong to a community is both very desirable and not very easy. In this respect, they are greatly more sophisticated than those secular political theorists who write lyrically about the loss of a sense of community, while refusing to acknowledge the inherently dark aspects of social life. Religions teach us to be polite, to honour one another, to be faithful and sober, but they also know that if they do not allow us to be or do otherwise every once in a while, they will break our spirit. In their most sophisticated moments, religions accept the debt that goodness, faith and sweetness owe to their opposites.
4.
Medieval Christianity certainly understood this dichotomy. For most of the year, it preached solemnity, order, restraint, fellowship, earnestness, a love of God and sexual decorum, and then on New Yearâs Eve it opened the locks on the collective psyche and unleashed the
festum fatuorum
, theFeast of Fools. For four days, the world was turned on its head: members of the clergy would play dice on top of the altar, bray like donkeys instead of saying âAmenâ, engage in drinking competitions in the nave, fart in accompaniment to the Ave Maria and deliver spoof sermons based on parodies of the gospels (the Gospel according to the Chickenâs Arse, the Gospel according to Lukeâs Toenail). After drinking tankards of ale, they would hold their holy books upside down, address prayers to vegetables and urinate out of bell towers. They âmarriedâ donkeys, tied giant woollen penises to their tunics and endeavoured to have sex with anyone of either gender who would have them.
To stay sane, we may need an occasional moment to deliver a sermon according to Lukeâs Toenail. A nineteenth-century illustration of the medievalFeast of Fools. ( illustration credit 2.17 )
But none of this was considered just a joke. It was sacred, a
parodia sacra
, designed to ensure that all the rest of the year things would remain the right way up. In 1445, the Paris Faculty of Theology explained to the bishops of France that the Feast of Fools was a necessary event in the Christian calendar, âin order that foolishness, which is our second nature and is inherent in man, can freely spend itself at least once a year. Wine barrels burst if from time to time we do not open them and let in some air. All of us men are barrels poorly put together, and this is why we permit folly on certain days: so that we may in the end return with greater zeal to the service of God.â
The moral we should draw is that if we want well-functioning communities, we cannot be naive about our nature. We must fully accept the depths of our destructive, antisocial feelings. We shouldnât banish feasting and debauchery to the margins, to be mopped up by the police and frowned upon by commentators. We should give chaos pride of place once a year or so, designating occasions on which we can be briefly exemptedfrom the two greatest pressures of secular adult life: having to be rational and having to be faithful. We should be allowed to talk gibberish, fasten woollen penises to our coats and set out into the night to party and copulate randomly and joyfully with strangers, and then return the next morning to our partners, who will themselves have been off doing something similar, both sides knowing that it was nothing personal, that it was the Feast of Fools that made them do it.
5.
We learn from religion not only about the charms of community. We learn also that a good community accepts just how much there is in us that doesnât really want community â or at least canât tolerate it in its ordered forms all the time. If we have our feasts of love, we must also have our feasts of
Jessica Conant-Park, Susan Conant