it could fly.
GOD
Pulled against a gaudy
predicament gaudy
a lance or trap
up from the sequel not to point exactly but give direction from the underworld
gaudy
an appraisal from above looking down at oceans lit or at her great ring on its envy finger
“predicament” as was being said before the talk after the ease coming up against this
maw of shine, abundant also in a direction
where you could say form is what repeats itself
or what inhabits the sign of its meaning
predictable, yes, the graveyard only a stone’s throw from my throat
glad to be smiled upon even by those
who know nothing of our latest crimes
stealth, lies, cruelty, women stoned, girls stolen, one abuse after—
A doll, let’s say again a doll, dressed in her conceit dress,
flounced, elaborately tied, buttons, bows,
tiny underthings, smalls and smaller smalls, white socks,
black shoes with laces. It
does not age, it fades, molds, rips in the ways that beset things.
Is this a lyric? Can you tell me if this is a lyric?
It is about a doll, which is a thing and also an image, one
kind of thing image. Anyway, there is a doll.
A “female,” or else a cross-dresser, doubtful, but
an interesting idea for an image.
You would have to lift up her petticoats.
Is this the same doll? Is it archival?
Is it part of a collection, people have collections of dolls,
they are serial doll lovers.
I have had many dolls, and many lovers.
Does this make me a lyric poet?
Am I singing now, the way the doll might have sung
something from “Guys and Dolls,” a musical,
in which there were lyrics I once knew by heart.
If I know things by heart, does this make me a lyric poet?
If I substitute the word “God” for doll, does that make me a religious poet?
“They are serial God lovers.”
“I have had many gods, and many lovers.”
“Something from Guys and Gods, a musical.”
“Am I singing now, the way God might have sung?”
In this substitution, a gull flies out,
and it cries real tears. Does this make me a nature poet,
a metaphysical poet? A god is an intellectual thing.
M. AND F. AT THE K.G.B.
Trickily absorbed into ekphrastic juvenalia
shot from the hip. Think I’ll listen to Emmy Lou
before the fervor of the andante.
Shostakovich, plural and harmonic
but repeated over there, in the mud
with young boys and their tools, their faces
sweating with boundary.
Old goat’s lust for the worldly arena.
A woman of emendation, a man of domestic glass
came to speak to us before our trip,
upbraid our vague dilemmas
and such quotidian enunciations as the Dow
beyond what we might have witnessed
in the early homespun riot
before the colossal carried us off into infrastructure
inverting the usual designation of
girl-boy trials—she
tracks the insignia of thought, thinks the bleachers
will hold, he would open each flower, blossom
in the appellant of a kindly disciple: Moses, one shoe off,
rises to the tinsel bush. She is
recursive, belonging to an addition, like a
good logic, marries Mayakovsky to the sublime
as she submits her laws to our court.
His entreaty to come through the kitchen door
rivals concordance, and so
they agree:
trot trot trot
to a different beat.
PRECISION TUNING
Curtailed argument for small alert
less than alert contaminated
singular
came as thought
thought contrived instances of good
the good night captured
illegally captured drawn smoke
without looking up smoke rises through slots
drastic in the slotted spoon or held
Annunciation’s drastic fidelity
still following as faithful thought
hurt its lungs, slept.
Such incipience must conjure new ordeals
ordeals specific to this
this being troubled by sanction
so that the sanctions come from above
as if rain, from above but superimposed.
The superior army imposed
the prohibited calm
those who