Perhaps heâs been thinking about our interview, though Iâd be surprised if heâs gone to any trouble and Iâm beginning to think Iâve got enough for what the magazine needs. Yet he talks quickly and deliberately, as if he had prepared things he wanted to say. I put aside notebook and pencil because I want to engage more fully in the conversation and just hope, since he often repeats and emphasizes things, Iâll be able to recall and note down exactly what he says later.
âThe thing is, Michael,â Francis remarks diffidently, âone canât really talk about painting, only around it. After all if you could explain it why would you bother to do it?â Heâs brought us both a very strong cup of tea and we sit perched at either end of the soft, squidgy green sofa. âThose things are very strange. Iâve no idea how you could present them in a factual way in your interview and yet make them a little bit interesting. Thatâs what I feel so often in painting. I mean I know exactly what I want to do, but I canât find the
way
in which this thing can be made. I want a deeply ordered image, you see, but I want it to come about by chance. You always hope that the paint will do more for you, but mostly itâs like painting a wall when the very first brushstroke you do gives a sudden shock of reality that is cancelled out as you paint the whole surface.
âWhat one wants in art nowadays is a shorthand where the sensation comes across right away. You have to give things right away, otherwise people canât be bothered. All you can ever do, obviously, is to work as close to your instinct as possible. WhatI always hope for â this sounds terribly pretentious, perhaps one always sounds pretentious when oneâs talking about oneself â is this one absolutely perfect image which will cancel all the others out. Make this thing like an idol which would blink out all kinds of other beautiful images. When Iâm away from the studio, abroad for instance, I keep thinking how I might do this thing. I was walking round those formal gardens at Versailles not very long ago and all these images kept simply dropping in to my mind, just like that, one after another, like slides. Well, itâs marvellous when that happens, of course, and I couldnât wait to get back to London and work.
âWhat one longs to do above all, I think, is to reinvent appearance, make it stranger, and more exciting. Thatâs whatâs so extraordinary about Velázquez: he reinvented the very outline of appearance. You only have to look at the way things are in his paintings. He managed to come back to appearance by way of something that lay quite outside the kind of illustration that was expected of him at the time. But itâs a hairâs-breadth thing, particularly nowadays. If you go too far, you just fall into abstraction.
âYou would love somehow to make this marvellous, poignant image and at the same time elevate it on to a kind of stage. So that without using any kind of narrative, you managed to fill it with all sorts of implications. I myself am always looking as I go to and fro every morning in my cage here for ways in which I might make sensation come across with as much immediacy as possible. But this is only something you can do for yourself. I can only paint for myself, to excite myself, you see, and Iâm always surprised when other people are interested in it. All painting, well all art, is about sensation. Or at least it should be. After all, life itself is about sensation.â
Francis produces this last phrase like a rabbit out of a hat which makes me laugh, which in turn seems to please him. He goes padding off in his silent desert boots and comes back with a frosted bottle of Krug and two glasses.
âNow where shall we have dinner?â he asks, as if that is a far more important issue than talking about art and life. He seems almost