MANAGER.
CHAPTER FIVE
The following evening
Subject: Test
Hello Emmi,
Let me know if you get this.
Leo
Half an hour later
Re:
Yes, I got it. But you get this, Leo, I havenât exactly enjoyed your company these past few days. Whatâs the matter with you? Where have you been? What are you trying to do? What the hell are you playing at? Why are you setting the Systems Manager onto me? I thought for a moment that youâd run away back to Boston.
Two minutes later
Re:
Iâm sorry, Emmi. Iâm really sorry! Evidently thereâs been a serious software error. My Outlook account was accidently unsubscribed. Maybe I missed a payment. Iâve had no messages for three days. Did you write to me?
Twelve minutes later
Re:
Yes, Leo, I did write to you. I asked you a question. I waited two and a half days for an answer. I was worried sick, felt like I did during those marvelous days before you escaped to America. I even tried to phone you. I wasnât going to say anything, I just wanted to hear your voice, but there was a message saying that your old number had ânot been recognized.â I wept at the thought of you, but no tears came. I giggled hysterically at the thought of you. It struck me that something that had never really begun was already over for a second time. Those were the high points of my miserable existence for the duration of your serious software error. As if there werenât enough things keeping us apart, the âsystem,â which seems to have played a starring role in all this, throws another one into the mix. The space weâre inhabiting is so creepy, Iâm just shattered. Good night. Lovely to have you back. Lovely and comforting.
Three minutes later
Re:
Dear Emmi,
Please believe me, it pains me to have hurt you. It was an act of God: computer technology, whatever, separating us just as swiftly as it connects us. Our feelings are powerless against it. Forgive me. And sleep well, my love.
The following morning
Subject: Your question
Good morning, Emmi. Iâve just been on the phone to a âspecialist.â The âsystemâ is up and running again. I hope you had a good sleep. Oh yes, you said youâd asked me something. What was it you wanted to know?
All my love,
Leo
One hour later
Re:
In short: today, 3 p.m., Café Huber?
Thirty minutes later
Re:
Yes, but (â¦). No, not but. Yes!
Twenty minutes later
Re:
Great! And it took you half an hour to come up with that remarkable causal chain, Leo dear? ONLY half an hour? Do you mind if I analyze it? First there was a âyes,â an apparently resolute affirmative. Then came a comma, in expectation of an additional element to the sentence. Then there was a âbut,â heralding a qualification. After that came a round open parenthesis. Then three points to convey a variety of thoughts shrouded in mystery. Then enough discipline to close the parentheses and wrap up this confusing mystery. Then a traditional full stop to maintain the outward appearance of order and to mask inner turmoil. And then all of a sudden a truculent little âno,â as if to signify a purposeful refusal. Another comma, anticipating additional information, and after that a ânot,â an outright rejection. And then another âbut,â a dissipation, a âbutâ that is only there to demonstrate that there isnât one anymore. All doubt has been intimated. No doubt has been voiced. All doubt has been cast aside. And at the end what weâre left with is a gutsy little âyes,â complete with a defiant exclamation mark. To repeat: âYes, but (â¦). No, not but. Yes!â What a poetic description of your fickleness. What a lyrical exposition of your decision-making processes. This man knows exactly that he doesnât know what he wants. And he knows better than anyone how to pass on this knowledge to the very individual it concerns. All in barely half an