to the life of man, the publication of a book ought not to be the most excruciating. Since everybody has a book out now â a self-help manual, a childrenâs book, a self-help manual on the writing of a childrenâs book, a memoir of the time you tried to write a childrenâs book, a self-help manual on how to write a memoir of the time you tried to write a childrenâs book â the anticlimax of publication is common knowledge. But some writers still manage to rise to the occasion. Myself â and if you think this is a roundabout way of announcing the appearance of my new novel, you are right â I find the whole thing hell. Nothing to do with reviews or sales. Itâs book-signing that upsets me, not the having to do it but the being unable to do it â the mess I make. I donât know how other authors fare, but every book I sign I deface.
My pen is always wrong. Wouldnât you think I would know by now to be sure I have a decent pen on me? I used to swear by fountain pens, but the last time I used one I leaked all over the title page and in the act of apologising profusely â you know the style: head thrown back, arms waving â I leaked all over the people queuing for my signature. Is there a greater crime an author can commit on publication day than to blot his readers?
So itâs been a ballpoint ever since. But even ballpoints can smudge. Last week at Hay I smudged about twenty pages. Horrible globules of sticky ballpoint ink on the first and final flourishes of my signature. In panic I tried faking hay fever, hoping that a surreptitious handkerchief would serve as blotting paper, but you soon discover that your readers are no keener on having bits of tissue sticking to their books than they are on your sneezing into them. There might be professions where fans will take anything from their idols, a filthy paper handkerchief included, but novel writing isnât one of them. Thereafter, whenever a blob or gloop of inky gunk appeared I just smiled and closed the book abruptly. With a bit of luck the pages will have stuck together by now.
I am also illegible. Other novelists note the time it takes me to finish a signing session, supposing that I must have twice as many readers wanting my book signed as they have. In fact, the length of my queue is to be explained by the number of people coming back a second or a third time to get me to decipher what I wrote for them originally. As if I knew! âHow do you expect me to remember that?â I ask them. âWeâre not asking you to remember,â they say, âweâre just asking you to read it.â I have to explain to them that Iâm a writer not a reader. âSo what was it you wrote?â they want to know. âIâm the wrong one to ask,â I tell them, âIâm illegible. But itâs probably my name.â
In fact, itâs never just my name. I am temperamentally incapable of writing just my name. I donât do legible and I donât do brief. While we were at Hay my partner got John Updikeâs signature. âTo Jenny, with best wishes and cheers.â Imagine being able to do that! âBest wishes and cheers.â You might ask why âBest wishesâ and âcheersâ, but still and all, such pithiness! Iâve never managed anything so economical in my entire career. Even the âToâ I canât pull off. I always think it should be âForâ, implying that the book was written with this very reader in mind, or that I am making a gift of it, which of course Iâm not. But most times I no sooner write âForâ than I realise it is inappropriately personal and might conceivably cause the reader problems, especially if sheâs a woman and her husband sees it, so I cross it out and write âToâ instead. Add the crossing-out to the blobs of ink and strips of tissue and thatâs not a pretty page theyâre left