surprised at the levels of support weâre receiving. As I told you yesterday, the situation is nowhere near as hopeless as you appear to think. Things have begun to change in the past few years. People are revising their views about postwar architecture. Did you get a chance to look at that link I sent you last month?â
âYou mean to that ridiculous property programme? Yes, I did take a look.â
Angelo seemed a little thrown by Ottoâs tone and hesitated before continuing.
âI know that sort of thing isnât really to your taste, but it can be a useful way to generate support in a situation like this.â
âI suppose it can,â Otto replied, with little enthusiasm.
âHelps spread the message to a broader public, educates them about the value of twentieth-century architecture, you know the sort of thing.â
âIâd hardly call programmes of that sort educational,â said Otto. âVacuous morons, leaping about with paintbrushes, working out how many thousands they can add to the value of their investment. Those apartments werenât built for their benefit,â he added. âThey were meant to improve the lives of the socially excluded.â
âAnd thatâs exactly what Marlowe House has done,â broke in Angelo. âWell, thatâs what weâll be trying to argue. If Taylor House, which is now largely privately owned, has received a listing, then surely Marlowe House â earlier, architecturally more significant and still serving the purpose for which it was designed â well, surely that deserves a listing, too.â
âItâs a nice argument,â said Otto, âbut there are some voices missing in all this.â
âAnd whose are those?â
âThe residents. What do they think? From what I read in The Architectural Eye, they were pretty much unanimous in their condemnation. People hate living in Marlowe House, apparently. Thatâs why they want to knock the thing down.â
The disappointment in Ottoâs voice was clear.
âAnd ultimately, whatever the architectural merits of the building, whatever its place as a piece of post-war social history, if the people who actually live there regard it as a failure, then perhaps one should admit that it probably is a failure.â
Angelo sought to pluck Otto free of his descending gloom. He had strong ideas of his own on the subject.
âYou canât blame yourself for the current condition of Marlowe House,â he said. â Youâre not responsible for the direction British society has taken over the past thirty years. The lack of public investment, the crumbling social fabric, drugs, crime, everyone for themselves, the rampant materialism, turning our built heritage into a used-car lot.â
Angelo was getting into his stride now. It was obvious he had spent time as Ottoâs apprentice.
âIf Marlowe House has become emblematic of the modern urban nightmare, then thatâs the result of multiple social and economic factors â not the fact that itâs made of bloody concrete, whatever the authorities might say. Look at Taylor House, itâs becoming a popular place to live. Marlowe House is very similar, physically. The only difference is that itâs in a more deprived part of town. If it had been properly maintained by the authorities, and if society hadnât long ago pulled the plug on the poor sods who live there, we wouldnât have a fraction of the problems that exist there today. Donât let the politicians try to push the blame for this onto you, Otto. Itâs their failure â not yours.â
Angelo paused to draw breath, while Otto considered his answer.
âYou have a point,â he conceded. âAnd Iâm almost convinced ⦠but Iâd still like to know what the residents think.â
Angelo paused. Should he say it now? Why not?
âThereâs another reason Iâve