the Polish army repulsed the invading Soviet army. The experience contributed significantly to then Bishop Rattiâs view of the worldâas had lessons of Austrian rule in his home region of Lombardy. The church was also under attack after the fall of Czar Nicholas II in the Russian Revolution. Leninâs Bolsheviks destroyed churches and imprisoned priests throughout Russia. Nevertheless, as pope in the 1920s, Ratti sought a gesture that might make life easier for Catholics still in Russia. He sent food aid to the new Marxist-Leninist state, but the gesture did not result in improved relations with Moscow. The birth of the Soviet Union brought into vogue with Catholic churchmen the phrase âGodless Communism.â The church confronted the question of whether Hitler was a worthy ally against Communism, whether âthe enemy of my enemyâ was a friend, or one more enemy?
This was a central issue at the Vatican when Pope Benedict XV died of pneumonia in 1922, and when Achille Ratti, who was then sixty-four years old, became the compromise choice to replace him. He was elected pope by the College of Cardinals on the fourteenth ballot after one other prelate had turned down the job. Rattiâs opponents said he was not worldly enough to govern and that he had lived his entire life in a world of books. Though he had been a librarian for a long while, the criticism was unwarranted. In terms of daring and adventurousness, there has been no other priestâor any other pope before or sinceâwho traversed mountain passes that now bear his name and none other who had the stamina to climb unattainable peaks. Somewhere at the heart of his increasingly passionate drive against Hitler and Mussolini was the drive to break the mold and to do what others would not or could not do. These were not the aspirations of a bookish, retiring man.
AS HE RECOVERED after 1936 from his ailments, the pope would carry on with a normal scheduleâhe had much left to be accomplished. Central was his intention to continue, even accelerate, the pace of his attacks on Hitler and Mussolini, to reject anti-Semitism, and to seek new ways to warn the world about the growing threat of war in Europe. Hitler and Mussolini were mightily concerned by the popeâs recent actions and declarations. Such was a measure of the moral power of the papacy. Pius XI knew well that his speeches and the resulting worldwide headlines enraged Hitler. He criticized the Nazis and their anti-Semitic tirades with increasing vigor in the hope this would spur international action before it was too late.
Along with his speech about Hitlerâs presence in Rome on May 4, the pope authorized a similar statement by his American aide and interpreter, Monsignor Joseph Hurley. This new statement again emphasized the images of two crosses, the Christian cross and the crooked cross of Nazism. The pope had banned coverage of Hitlerâs trip, but there would be strong language, both on Vatican Radio and in the Vatican newspaper, Osservatore Romano .
John LaFargeâs European trip, MayâOctober 1938.
âThere are two crosses now side by side in Rome . . . the cross of Christianity and the crooked cross of neo-paganism,â it said, without crediting Hurley as the author. Hurleyâs anonymous words were translated and read on Vatican Radio in Italian, English, German, and French and published in Osservatore Romano . The âcrooked crossâ became the image of Vatican-Nazi relations. The statement sent Hitler into a fury, and Mussolini ordered the seizure and destruction of any copies of the Vatican newspaper circulating outside the Vatican walls.
Cardinals at the Vatican reacted with fear, worried about reprisals against Catholics in Germany, Austria, and Italy. Britain and the United States were also surprised by the strength of Piusâs words. Once he been considered a conservative pope who embraced authoritarians and