Ida Gransbury and Mr.
Richard Negus—they arrive separately and appear to
have nothing to do with one another. And yet all three
share not merely the date of their deaths, which was
yesterday, but also their date of arrival at the Bloxham
Hotel: Wednesday.”
“What’s remarkable about it?” I asked. “Plenty of
other guests must also have arrived on Wednesday in
a hotel of this size. I mean, ones that have not been
murdered.”
Poirot’s eyes looked as if they were about to burst
forth from his head. I couldn’t see that I had said
anything particularly shocking, so I pretended not to
notice his consternation, and continued to tell him the
facts of the case.
“Each of the victims was found inside his or her
locked bedroom,” I said, feeling rather self-conscious
about the “his or her” part. “The killer locked all
three doors and made off with the keys—”
“ Attendez, ” Poirot interrupted. “You mean that the
keys are missing. You cannot know that the murderer
took them or has them now.”
I took a deep breath. “We suspect that the killer
took the keys away with him. We’ve done a thorough
search, and they are certainly not inside the rooms,
nor anywhere else in the hotel.”
“My excellent staff have checked and confirmed
that this is true,” said Lazzari.
Poirot said that he would like to perform his own
thorough search of the three rooms. Lazzari joyously
agreed, as if Poirot had proposed a tea party followed
by dancing.
“Check all you like, but you won’t find the three
room keys,” I said. “I’m telling you, the murderer took
them. I don’t know what he did with them, but—”
“Perhaps he put them in his coat pocket, with one,
or three, or five monogrammed cufflinks,” Poirot said
coolly.
“Ah, now I see why they speak of you as the most
splendid detective, Monsieur Poirot!” Lazzari
exclaimed, though he can’t have understood Poirot’s
remark. “You have a superb mind, they say!”
“Cause of death is looking very much like
poisoning,” I said, disinclined to linger over
descriptions of Poirot’s brilliance. “We think cyanide,
which can work with great speed if the quantities are
sufficient. The inquest’ll tell us for sure, but . . .
almost certainly their drinks were poisoned. In the
case of Harriet Sippel and Ida Gransbury, that drink
was a cup of tea. In the case of Richard Negus, it was
sherry.”
“How is this known?” Poirot asked. “The drinks
are still there in the rooms?”
“The cups are, yes, and Negus’s sherry glass. Only
the remaining few drops of the drinks themselves, but
it’s easy enough to tell tea from coffee. We will find
cyanide in those drops, I’ll wager.”
“And the time of death?”
“According to the police doctor, all three were
murdered between four o’clock in the afternoon and
half past eight in the evening. Luckily, we’ve managed
to narrow it down further: to between a quarter past
seven and ten minutes past eight.”
“A stroke of luck indeed!” Lazzari agreed. “Each
of the . . . ah . . . deceased guests was last seen alive
at fifteen minutes after seven o’clock, by three
unquestionably dependable representatives of this
hotel—so we know this must be true! I myself found
the deceased persons—so terrible, this tragedy!—at
between fifteen and twenty minutes after eight
o’clock.”
“But they must have been dead by ten past eight,” I
told Poirot. “That was when the note announcing the
murders was found on the front desk.”
“Wait, please,” said Poirot. “We will get to this
note in due course. Monsieur Lazzari, it is surely not
possible that each of the murder victims was last seen
alive by a member of hotel staff at a quarter past
seven precisely ?”
“Yes.” Lazzari nodded so hard, I feared his head
might fall off his neck. “It is very, very true. All three
ordered dinner to be brought to their rooms at a
quarter past