discordant piano noodling. I know, I know â neither âBaby Letâs Play Houseâ nor â(Hit Me) Baby One More Timeâ begins with piano noodling, and they wouldnât have been much good if they had; thatâs not what pop is supposed to be about. But DiFrancoâs song is nothing if not ambitious, because what it does â or, at any rate, what it pretends to do â is describe the genesis of its own creation: it shows its workings, in a way that would delight any maths teacher. When it kicks off, the noodling sounds impressionistic, like a snatch of soundtrack for an arty but emotional film â maybe Donât Look Now , because the piano has a sombre, churchy feel to it, and you can imagine Donald Sutherland and Julie Christie wandering aroundVenice in the cold, grieving and doomed. But it cheers up a little, when DiFranco makes out that sheâs suddenly hit upon the gorgeous little riff that gives the song its spine. Sheâs not quite there yet, because she hasnât found anything to do with her left hand, so thereâs a little bit more messing about; and then, as if by magic (although of course we know that itâs merely the magic of hard work and talent) she works out a counterpoint, and sheâs there. Indeed, she celebrates the birth of the song by shoving the piano out of the way and playing the song proper on acoustic guitar â the two instruments are fused together with a deliberately improbable seamlessness on the recording, as if she wants us to see this as a metaphor for the creative process, rather than as the creative process itself. Itâs a sweet idea, a fanâs dream of how music is created; Iâd love to be a musician precisely because a part of me believes that this is exactly how songs are born, just as some people who are not writers believe that we are entirely dependent on the appearance of a muse.
And, thankfully, the song proper isnât anticlimactic: âYou Had Timeâ is perhaps the gentlest and most generous-spirited break-up song I know. (And just as the intro is a talentless fanâs dream of musical creativity, this generous-spiritedness is a liberal heterosexualâs idea of how nice gaywomen are to each other, even when their relationships fail. While straight men are inwardly plotting revenge while feigning indifference, and straight women are cutting the crotches out of expensive trousers, gay women are hugging and crying and pledging eternal friendship. This is actually offensive nonsense, of course â unhappily, the only intelligent right-on response is to recognize that gays are as violent, unpleasant, pious, judgemental and unreflective as everyone else â but âYou Had Timeâ is so sweet-tempered that it inspires this sort of embarrassing stereotyping.) What gives âYou Had Timeâ some of its power is that, whereas most break-up songs are definitively heartsick, this is a song about indecision and stasis. The narrator has just returned from a tour of some kind; both her fingers and her voice are sore, so we must presume that she is a guitarist and singer (you must forgive us, Ani, if we temporarily confuse fiction and autobiography). It becomes apparent that, while away, the narrator is supposed to have sorted out what she wants to do about her relationship, and so the title of the song, it becomes clear, is her loverâs predictable and legitimate retort to the age-old plea. Anyway, sheâs had all this time, and she still hasnât made up her mind . . . Except, the song manages to imply, she has, really: she knows itâs over. In one lovely, and very sad,couplet, the narrator says, simply: âYou are a china shop and I am a bull / You are very good food and I am fullâ . . . See what I mean about generous-spiritedness? How many of us wouldnât have felt better about being dumped if someone said that to us? But the song ends dreamily, with