the Midsummer holidays, Jack was as full of argument as he was fond of it. He would argue the point to the point of a needle, and he would divide that point into as many as there were days of the year, and argue upon each. In short, there was no end to Jackâs arguing the point, although there seldom was point to his argument.
Jack had been fishing in the river, without any success, for a whole morning, and observed a large pond which had the appearance of being well stockedâhe cleared the park palings, and threw in his line. He had pulled up several fine fish, when he was accosted by the proprietor, accompanied by a couple of keepers.
âMay I request the pleasure of your name, young gentleman?â said the proprietor to Jack.
Now Jack was always urbane and polite.
âCertainly, sir; my name is Easy, very much at your service.â
âAnd you appear to me to be taking it very easy,â replied the gentleman. âPray, sir, may I inquire whether you are aware that you are trespassing?â
âThe word trespass, my dear sir,â replied Jack, âwill admit of much argument, and I will divide it into three heads. It implies, according to the conventional meaning, coming without permission upon the land or property of another. Now, sir, the question may all be resolved in the following: Was not the world made for all? and has any one, or any portion of its inhabitants, an exclusive right to claim any part of it, as his property? If you please, I have laid down the proposition, and we will now argue the point.â
The gentleman who accosted Jack had heard of Mr Easy and his arguments; he was a humorist, and more inclined to laugh than to be angry; at the same time that he considered it necessary to show Jack that under existing circumstances they were not tenable.
âBut, Mr Easy, allowing the trespass on the property to be venial, surely you do not mean to say that you are justified in taking my fish; I bought the fish, and stocked the pond, and have fed them ever since. You cannot deny but that they are private property, and that to take them is a theft?â
âThat will again admit of much ratiocination, my dear sir,â replied Jack; âbut,âI beg your pardon, I have a fish.â Jack pulled up a large carp, much to the indignation of the keepers, and to the amusement of their master, unhooked it, placed it in his basket, renewed his bait with the greatest sang froid, and then throwing in his line, resumed his discourse. âAs I was observing, my dear sir,â continued Jack, âthat will admit of much ratiocination. All the creatures of the earth were given to man for his useâman means mankindâthey were never intended to be made a monopoly of. Water is also the gift of heaven, and meant for the use of all. We now come to the question how far the fish are your property. If the fish only bred on purpose to please you, and make you a present of their stock, it might then require a different line of argument; but as in breeding they only acted in obedience to an instinct with which they are endowed on purpose that they may supply man, I submit to you that you cannot prove these fish to be yours more than mine. As for feeding with the idea that they were your own, that is not an unusual case in this world, even when a man is giving bread and butter to his children. Furtherâbut I have another biteâI beg your pardon, my dear sirâah! heâs off againââ
âThen, Mr Easy, you mean to say that the world and its contents are made for all.â
âExactly, sir; that is my fatherâs opinion, who is a very great philosopher.â
âHow then does your father account for some possessing property and others being without it?â
âBecause those who are the strongest have deprived those who are weaker.â
âBut would not that be always the case even if we were in that state of general inheritance which