flowing
blond hair, once commented, “Jack didn’t want to be mistaken for anything other than
an artist.”
In Schwankovsky’s class, which met five times a week in a basement studio, Pollock
first began to draw. He felt immediately dissatisfied with his work, and his high
school image as a cocky young artist contrasts sharply with the insecure, self-disparaging
person who emerges from his letters. Writing to Charles, his accomplished oldest brother,
Pollock confessed to being “doubtful of any ability.” He went on to offer a devastating
appraisal of his earliest artwork: “my drawing i will tell you frankly is rotten it
seems to lack freedom and rythem it is cold and lifeless, it isn’t worth the postage
to send it.” While the asperity of these comments is surely related to Pollock’s sense
of unworthiness in the shadow of his older brother, his harsh self-criticism was not
entirely unjustified. None of his high school drawings survives, but it may be said
on the basis of later work that by no means was Pollock a precocious draftsman. As
his brother Sande once said, “If you had seen his early work you’d have said he should
go into tennis, or plumbing.”
Whatever Pollock lacked in facility, however, he made up for in vision. It is rather
extraordinary that in his first written appraisal of his artwork he should have faulted
his drawing for lacking “freedom and rythem,” qualities he considered important, if
not the essence of drawing. While most students were trying to master perspective
and learn how to draw a realistic likeness of a face, a hand, or a bowl of fruit,
Pollock had no patience for such details. The rules of art ran against his instincts.
Already he was seeking “freedom” from formal conventions, sacrificing detail to the
whole. He could not achieve what he wanted; on the other hand, he fully intended to.
“i think there should be an advancement soon if it is ever to come,” he noted to Charles
with characteristic self-disparagement, “and then i will send you some drawings.”
At school Pollock felt uncomfortable among his peers. People “frightened and bored”
him, he wrote, forcing him to remain within his “shell.” But for all his timidity,
Pollock had no difficulty befriending—and at times alienating—his fellow students
in Schwankovsky’s class. Philip Goldstein, a dark, angular, intense young artist who
worshiped Piero della Francesca, would laterbecome well known as Philip Guston. He and Pollock spent many afternoons at the home
of Manuel Tolegian, an affable, powerfully built youth of Armenian descent, who had
converted a chicken coop behind his house into a studio for himself and his friends.
Together, working in the dark, cramped, low-roofed studio, the three boys would pick
out reproductions from their favorite art books and spend long hours copying the pictures.
Both Guston and Tolegian had a natural talent for drawing; the studio walls, covered
with pencil sketches after Uccello and Piero, offered testimony to their ability.
Pollock’s work, by comparison, was noticeably undistinguished. But no matter how frustrated
he may have felt, he was unwilling to admit to his classmates that he considered his
work lacking. To the contrary, Pollock would criticize his friends’ work. “You think
that’s original?” he used to say, eyeing his schoolmates’ copies of Renaissance masters.
“What’s so original about that?” Though Guston tended to ignore these boyish displays,
Tolegian would become furious, reminding Pollock in his deep, booming voice that to
be a great artist one first had to master anatomy, linear perspective, and so on.
Pollock apparently delighted in rousing his friend to anger. He signed Tolegian’s
yearbook “For more and better arguments. Hugo Pollock.”
Pollock preferred sculpting to painting or drawing. He and his friends sometimes visited
a quarry near
Melinda Metz - Fingerprints - 7