the work can be sometimes overwhelming. I always go back to the letters,â Patrick Hemingway told me in 1987, a sentence that seems only truer with time.
Hemingwayâs momentary high spirits in early April 1934 must have had at least two prongs: he was back from his excellent safari adventure; and now, before heading home by train to Florida, he hoped to go to a Brooklyn boatyard and put in an order for his own longed-for fishing machine. And yet, what his letters, cojoined with verifiable facts of his life just then, suggest is that what might have seemed so clear in a photograph and in what he told some shipside reporters didnât nearly reflect what Hemingway was generally feeling inside. Every good photograph has a secret, acritic named Mark Stevens once wrote: âSomething mysteriously and tantalizingly withheld, even when the world seems laid out as plainly as a corpse upon a table.â
One verifiable truth is that the monarch of American letters had been riding through rough critical seas for the last few yearsâand much more rough going was up ahead. Somehow, nothing seemed quite as locked as it once did, and that included owning the reviewers. Not quite a year earlierâon June 13, 1933âthe author for whom things had once seemed to come so effortlessly had written to his book editor: âI am tempted never to publish another damned thing. The swine arent worth writing for. I swear to Christ theyâre not. Every phase of the whole racket is so disgusting that it makes you feel like vomiting.⦠And it is a commonplace that I lack confidence that I am a manâWhat shitâAnd Iâm supposed to go around with your good friends spreading that behind my backâAnd they imagine they will get away with it.â Heâd been referring specifically in this instance to his former friend Max Eastman (a fellow Scribners author), whoâd just written a half-joking and belated review of
Death in the Afternoon
for
The New Republic
titled âBull in the Afternoon.â The Hemingway style, Eastman said, was that âof wearing false hair on the chest.â In Hemingwayâs reading, and in the reading of some of his close friends, the piece wasnât trying to be humorous at all but rather was making overt suggestions to the effect that Hemingway must feel sexually inadequate. Well, heâd break Eastmanâs jaw the next time he saw him, and sell tickets to the event.
One way to read Ernest Hemingwayâs life is through the phenomenon of remarkable first luck. Heâd become an international literary figure, specifically as a novelist, so quicklyâin the second half of the 1920s, less than a decade from when heâd started out. Heâd started out with storiesâactually, sometimes just intensely felt imagistic fragments of stories. It was almost as if heâd had no real apprenticeship but had sprung full-blown into American consciousness as a serious writer. It wasnât true; it only seemed true. What is true is that, for nearly his whole life, Hemingway had a genius, among his many geniuses, for gathering knowledge inside of him with astonishing speedâlore, know-how, the names of streets in Kansas City. He seemed to learn everything and anything so early, almost as if to defy the word âlearn.â The statement can apply as much to the intricacies of big-game fishing as to the art of shaking daiquiris as to the craft of writing fiction: he simply found out, and lodged it inside him very fast. In so many instances, he seemed to mutate from eager novice to acknowledged expertwith barely any larval stage in between. The pattern was to learn from his bettersâbetters at the timeâand then to lap them on the track as if they were standing still.
The Sun Also Rises
, Hemingwayâs slim and enduring first novel about world-weary expats doing the bullfights in Pamplona, sixty thousand lyric words, was published when he was
Heinrich Fraenkel, Roger Manvell