no doubts, the young, no fear, no pride.â
Poirot said thoughtfully:
âSo to you Elsa Greer spoke in the words of Juliet?â
âYes. She was a spoiled child of fortuneâyoung, lovely, rich.She found her mate and claimed himâno young Romeo, a married, middle-aged painter. Elsa Greer had no code to restrain her, she had the code of modernity. â Take what you wantâwe shall only live once! ââ
He sighed, leaned back, and again tapped gently on the arm of his chair.
âA predatory Juliet. Young, ruthless, but horribly vulnerable! Staking everything on the one audacious throw. And seemingly she wonâ¦and thenâat the last momentâdeath steps inâand the living, ardent, joyous Elsa died also. There was left only a vindictive, cold, hard woman, hating with all her soul the woman whose hand had done this thing.â
His voice changed:
âDear, dear. Pray forgive this little lapse into melodrama. A crude young womanâwith a crude outlook on life. Not, I think, an interesting character. Rose white youth, passionate, pale, etc. Take that away and what remains? Only a somewhat mediocre young woman seeking for another life-sized hero to put on an empty pedestal.â
Poirot said:
âIf Amyas Crale had not been a famous painterââ
Mr. Jonathan agreed quickly. He said:
âQuiteâquite. You have taken the point admirably. The Elsas of this world are hero worshippers. A man must have done something, must be somebodyâ¦Caroline Crale, now, could have recognized quality in a bank clerk or an insurance agent! Caroline loved Amyas Crale the man, not Amyas Crale the painter. Caroline Crale was not crudeâElsa Greer was.â
He added:
âBut she was young and beautiful and to my mind infinitely pathetic.â
Hercule Poirot went to bed thoughtful. He was fascinated by the problem of personality.
To Edmunds, the clerk, Elsa Greer was a hussy, no more, no less.
To old Mr. Jonathan she was the eternal Juliet.
And Caroline Crale?
Each person had seen her differently. Montague Depleach had despised her as a defeatistâa quitter. To young Fogg she had represented Romance. Edmunds saw her simply as a âlady.â Mr. Jonathan had called her a stormy, turbulent creature.
How would he, Hercule Poirot, have seen her?
On the answer to that question depended, he felt, the success of his quest.
So far, not one of the people he had seen had doubted that whatever else she was, Caroline Crale was also a murderess.
Five
T HE P OLICE S UPERINTENDENT
E x-Superintendent Hale pulled thoughtfully at his pipe.
He said:
âThis is a funny fancy of yours, Mr. Poirot.â
âIt is, perhaps, a little unusual,â Poirot agreed cautiously.
âYou see,â said Hale, âitâs all such a long time ago.â
Hercule Poirot foresaw that he was going to get a little tired of that particular phrase. He said mildly:
âThat adds to the difficulty, of course.â
âRaking up the past,â mused the other. âIf there were an object in it, nowâ¦.â
âThere is an object.â
âWhat is it?â
âOne can enjoy the pursuit of truth for its own sake. I do. And you must not forget the young lady.â
Hale nodded.
âYes, I see her side of it. Butâyouâll excuse me, Mr. Poirotâyouâre an ingenious man. You could cook her up a tale.â
Poirot replied:
âYou do not know the young lady.â
âOh, come nowâa man of your experience!â
Poirot drew himself up.
âI may be, mon cher, an artistic and competent liarâyou seem to think so. But it is not my idea of ethical conduct. I have my standards.â
âSorry, Mr. Poirot. I didnât mean to hurt your feelings. But it would be all in a good cause, so to speak.â
âOh I wonder, would it really?â
Hale said slowly:
âItâs tough luck on a happy innocent girl
Heidi Murkoff, Sharon Mazel