living, so the catastrophe canât strike.
What catastrophe? she asked. She wouldnât stop.
The one the Saint carries with him, I said.
Luca looked at me. He wanted to know if I would stop.
That terrifying catastrophe, I added, to be sure that she understood clearly.
The woman was staring at me. She was trying to find out what I knew about it, and how well we knew her son. At least as well as she knew him, probably. The dark side of the Saint is on the surface of his actions, in the secret passages that he excavates in the light of the sun; his ruin is transparent, he submits to it without much reserve, anyone whoâs around can understand that itâs a catastrophe, and maybe even what sort.
Do you know where he goes when he disappears? the woman asked, firmly.
Sometimes the Saint disappears, thereâs no doubt about that. Days and nights, then he returns. We know. We even know something more, but this is our life, too, the woman has nothing to do with it.
We shook our heads no. A grimace, also, to reiterate no, we didnât know where he went.
The woman understood. So she said it in another way. You canât help him? she whispered. It was a prayer rather than a question.
Weâre with him, we like him, heâll always be with us, Luca said. He doesnât frighten us. Weâre not afraid.
Then the womanâs eyes filled with tears, maybe at the memory of how intransigent and infinite the instinct of friendship can be at our age.
No one said anything else for a while. It could have ended there.
But she must have thought she shouldnât be afraid if we werenât. So, still weeping, but faintly, she said, Itâs that business of the demons. Itâs the priests who put it in his head.
We didnât think she would press so far, but she had the courageâbecause deep down our mothers harbor, unnoticed, an incomparable audacity. They preserve it, dormant, among the prudent gestures of a lifetime, in order to use it fully on what they suspect is the appointed day. They will expend it at the foot of a cross.
The demons are taking him away from me, she said.
In a sense it was true. The way we see it, the story of the demons does come from the priests, but thereâs also something that has always been part of the Saint, with the power of something innate, and it existed before the priests gave it a name. None of us have that sensitivity to evil, a kind of morbid, terrifying attractionâincreasingly morbid, inevitably, because it is terrifyingâas none of us have the same vocation as the Saint for goodness, sacrifice, meekness, which are the consequence of that terror. Maybe there would be no need to trouble the demon, but in our world sanctity is closely entwined with an unspeakable familiarity with evil, as theGospels testify in the episode of the temptations, and as the murky lives of the mystics tell us. So there is talk of demons, without the prudence that one should have in talking of demons. And in the presence of pure souls like oursâof boys. The priests have no pity in this matter. Or prudence.
They eviscerated the Saint with these stories.
What we can do, we do. We give lightness to our time with him, and we follow him everywhere, into the recesses of good, and those of evilâas far as we can, in the former as in the latter. We do it not only out of friendly compassion but also out of true fascination, drawn by what he knows, and accomplishes. Disciples, brothers. In the light of his childish sanctity we learn things, and this is a privilege. When the demons surface, we endure his upward gaze as long as we can. Then we let him go, and wait for him to return. We forget the terror, and are capable of normal days with him, after any yesterday. We donât even think about it much, and if that woman had not compelled us to, we would almost never think about it. In fact I shouldnât even have mentioned it.
The woman told us frightening things