us.â
âI thought they werenât allowed to marry gentilesâas they also call us.â
âThey do it all the time, around here. Yes, Loring says old Mrs. Bartram was interested in Martha Stanley.â
âGood old tribal name.â
âI never knew a gypsy that wasnât called Stanley.â
âIs her husband a member of the tribe, in good standing?â
âNo, heâs dead. Died of pneumonia last winter. He was a friend of Pottleâs, and thatâs why Pottle donât want the gypsies blamed unless we get evidence against âem.â
âHave they any other influential friends?â
âDoc Loring. Heâs taken care of âem for years; gives âem a call now and then to make sure they havenât any infectious diseases in camp, and that they keep the place reasonably clean. He says theyâre the most harmless bunch of half-wits in the community, and donât do anywhere near as much damage as the village and farm people do. He says they get blamed for everything, from forest fires to chicken stealing, and all because they ainât Aryans. He says if he was mosquito-proof, the way they are, heâd like to be a gypsy himself. He says theyâre innocent but astray; something like that. Heâs quite a comical feller.â
â âAn innocent life, yet far astrayâ; donât tell me you have the Last Wordsworthian dispensing pills over in the village of Oakport!â
âOrmiston thinks it was the gypsies; but he talks so much, you donât hardly know what he really thinks. Mr. and Mrs. Beasley, they donât think anything.â
âWell, letâs tackle the other comforting possibility: a lunatic lady in a car.â
âYou think thatâs a comforting theory, do you?â
âYes, because it assumes irresponsibility on the part of the agent.â
âA crazy woman may be planning to distribute some more nightshade berries, and how are we going to prevent it?â
âShe wonât do it again if it was just an unfortunate blunder. I assume a well-meaning half-wit, confusing nightshade berries with huckleberries.â
âEven a half-wit would come forward, if she was well-meaning.â
âWould she, indeed? If I were in her shoes I might come forward; but not in person, Mitchellânot in person! I should send you a letter from the uttermost fringes of the jungles of Central America. But as she is a mere wisp of conjecture, letâs eliminate her for the moment. You know what we are now up against?â
âOh, yes; I know,â growled Mitchell. âPremeditation, and motive; but you tell me what these families had in common, for anybody to get at âem through their children.â
âIâll tell you two things the children had in common. First, their age. They were all approximately seven years old; but of course that may mean no more than that seven-year-olds are just old enough to be allowed to play alone, and just young enough to accept berries from strangers. The nightshade was pretty well advertised, wasnât it?â
âAdvertised?â
âDeliberately or not, who can say? There were berries on Tommy Ormistonâs sand pile, in the Beasley barn and on the slope behind it, in Julia Bartramâs hand; which makes it even more likely that mass murder was not intended. I mean, the two children who were found got treatment for atropine poisoning almost immediately, and Julia Bartram died only because she was allergic to it. We are to suppose that if Sarah Beasley had been found she might well have recovered, too.â
âThe berries were left there on purpose, so some of those children could be cured?â
âLet us charitably hope so.â
âThen we have three reasons, anyway, why nightshade was used. First, the children would like the look of the berries, and be willing to eat âem; second, theyâd advertise the