greatest.â
âSee you tomorrow night, Hank?â
âSure, Baldy.â
âHow about Confucius?â
âThatâs good. He was right in there, all right. . . .â
âJust another spot, my dear boy,â the scrubwoman said.
âAll right, Helen.â
âYou know you have the most lovely hands, like a violinist.â
âItâs nothing. Itâs really nothing at all.â
âYou been to college, havenât you?â
âYes, but college can never make a man intelligent. It can only educate him.â
âDo you write stories and poetry and stuff?â
âWell, yes.â
âYa had anything printed?â
âNot yet, Helen. Iâm still developing, you see.â
âDevelopâng?â
âYeah. You see, a writerâs got to go through a period of development.â
âYa mean, ya gotta shoot down airplanes or something first?â
âNot exactly. But it helps a hell of a lot.â
âWill you write a story about me, sometime?â
âMaybe. Maybe I will.â
âYou see, I was born in Pittsburgh, PA. My father was a doctor but he drank too much and they took away his licenseââ
The next morning as I turned over in bed, my freedom of movement was blocked by a very substantial mass of humanity: the scrubwoman.
âGood morninâ, honey boy!â
âOh . . . hello, Helen.â
âYa sure had a load-on, Hanky. The minute I began tellinâ you my life story, you began pourinâ it down left and right.â
âAnd then what happened?â
âDonât tell me you donât remember , honey boy?â
I leaped out of bed and began donning my clothing.
âWhere ya goinâ, honey boy?â
âDown to a bar. Down to some bar somewhere.â
âYa cominâ back, honey boy?â
âNot for three or four days, at least.â
I moved toward the door with some acceleration, opened it, and thenâ
âYa know somethinâ, honey boy?â
âWhat?â
âYa know who the greatest writer is?â
âI said âHomerâ but I really havenât given it much thought.â
â Y ou are, honey boy, and ya donât need any more development ! I never met this Homer guy, but I know he canât hold a candle ta YOU , honey boy!â
I closed the door and went bar-ward to seek the solace of my ex-con friend. He could have it: Homer and Helen, Helen and Homer, and all the development it implied. With D.H. Lawrence thrown in.
Manifesto: A Call for Our Own Critics
The insurgency of criticism from a nosography on poetics to a censorious dictum by certain university groups who write the laws of poetry, and spawn, with sumptuous grace and style, their own puppeteers âthese, and their half-brethren and their purlieu, form a most deadly and snobbish poetic fixation. They create, record, and argue their own history, charmed with the largesse of their chosen circumference.
What the university critics have lost in pulling down the blinds around their little ivy world they have gained in direction and prestige. To the remainder of us, the unwashed, the loiterers in pool halls and back alleys, there remains a frustrated and discordant yammering. In order to inculcate a more heuristic force, perhaps a manifesto, a gesture . . . a gestation . . . is necessary. It is difficult for a single poet to stand against the university coterie. Perhaps we too must invent our own history and choose our own gods if our portion of American literature is to receive a hearing on some tomorrow.
Our writers should acquaint themselves with the claustral intent and exorcises of the campus groupsâand let us be fair here: many of our imprint are not only pretty well unwashed but rather damn shoddily read as well (damn shoddily read as readers and damn shoddily read as writers). Our saving factors are our lack of
Katherine Alice Applegate