remembered the book fondly, but
it just didn’t look like current research.
I was a guest, though, and a very curious one,
so I listened carefully to each explanation. Like a good student, or a
brownnose, I asked pertinent questions at each station, though I generally knew
the answers. Like a good first date, I acted fascinated with his lecture while
calculating madly behind a polite smile. The truly interesting thing was that
there wasn’t a computer in sight. Most of the scientists I knew, at Wash U or
in industry, did a lot of their work with computer modeling.
We reached the end of the tour—and it was a tour, I realized. We had
progressed neatly through a catalogue of the various theories of space travel,
in progressive complexity.
Even more interesting than the missing
computer—like the dog that didn’t bark, I thought, mildly hysterically—was the
lack of any active work. Every experiment in the room was a demonstration of a solved problem. Hmm
again.
“Any questions?” Bert asked, with a look of
hope.
“I think you’ve answered—” I began, and stopped
myself. It definitely was a look of hope on his face, but he didn’t look like a
first date who was hoping for general praise. He looked more…I had seen that
look more than once over the years, but not in social situations…he looked…he
looked like a teacher who thought he might have found a protégée. He was almost
leaning toward me in the intensity of his hope that I would ask the smart
question and confirm that I was the pupil he’d been
looking for.
So I did. “I have no questions at all about the
displays here. They’re all quite easy to understand. I do have two questions,
though. One, where is your current work? And two, where is your computer?”
He beamed. “Let’s finish our sandwiches, and
I’ll tell you about it.”
“I notice you didn’t answer the very easy
questions. ‘Where’ doesn’t take a lot of explanation,” I said, smiling back.
“It doesn’t, does it? They are both in a
separate laboratory.” He bit into a sandwich and seemed to think a bit as he
chewed. “At the risk of insulting you, I have had poor experiences with
allowing access to my work before confirming interest and understanding.”
“Not at all,” I said. “I understand
completely.” That was a bit of an overstatement. I did understand hiding space
program stuff, or groundbreaking experiments that a rival might steal or
destroy, but something about Bert didn’t square with that sort of thing. He had
said that his specialty was odd, so it was unlikely he had any direct
competitors seething with jealousy.
Still, research was research, and even if I
hadn’t done any myself in years, I understood the protective instinct.
“Good.” He leaned in a little. “You did
understand all the experiments?” I nodded. “Completely?” I nodded again.
“Did you see anything there, or in your own
studies, that ruled out the possibility of time travel?”
“Time travel.” I took a moment to think. It
was easy to jeer at such science fiction/movie fantasy stuff, but at a very
basic level…hm. At a very basic level, in fact, all of what I had thought of as
space travel theory in the display could actually be the basis of time travel
theory. Einstein was said to have theorized about time travel, until he decided
it was impossible to exceed the speed of light. And tesseract theory was a time travel theory—it was just
that Star Trek and its competitors mostly used it as a method for traveling
fast enough to get to distant stars, and didn’t talk about the time factor
much.
The fact is, you talk long enough to smart
enough scientists, and you begin to doubt the rules about possibility. And
didn’t Arthur C. Clarke say something about sufficiently advanced science being
indistinguishable from magic?
Bert was watching me think, almost holding his
breath. I decided to answer the question he had
Christiane Shoenhair, Liam McEvilly