overwhelmed by the stench of fat being rendered in the cellar. Nothing she bought was ever worth much, her Staffordshire ornaments were always cracked, the âSheratonâ chair an Edwardian reproduction and the turbanned Rockingham man smoking a pipe had lost his hand (a little mitten-like paw made of plasticine Mamâs unconvincing prosthesis).
Still, her antiques, touching though they were in their inadequacy, were not an attempt to improve our social status. Though she herself would have said she liked âold stuff â because it was âclassyâ, this definition had nothing to do with class, âclassyâ in her vocabulary simply the opposite of âcommonâ. That was the real nub of it. Because if there was one consideration that determined my parentsâ conduct and defined their position in the world it was not to be (or to be thought) common.
Common, like camp (with which it shares a frontier), is not easy to define. At its simplest meaning vulgar or ostentatious, it is a more subtle and various disparagement than that, or was in our family anyway, taking in such widely disparate manifestations as tattoos, red paint, yellow gloves and two-tone cardigans, all entries in a catalogue of disapproval that ranged through fake leopard-skin coats and dyed (blonde) hair to slacks, cocktail cabinets, the aforementioned ladies with Alsatian dogs and boys with cherries, and umpteen other embellishments, domestic and personal.
The opposite of âcommonâ is not âuncommonâ; indeed an element of uncommonness in the ostentatious sense is part of being common â the dyed blonde hair and leopard-skin coat of Miss Fairey, the chemistâs assistant at Armley Moor Top, or twenty years later the white Jaguar in which Russell Hartyâs parents would roll up to visit him in Oxford. So flaunting it (whatever âitâ was) and splashing money around were part of it. But so was having no aspirations at all or living in something approaching squalor while squandering money on gambling or drink; that was common too.
A dog could be common â a barbered poodle â but seldom a cat; colours like the red of paint (on a house) and purple (practically anywhere). âThemâs common curtains,â Mamâs frequent observation fromthe top deck of a bus; it always had to be the top because Dad was a smoker and it served as a grandstand for a running commentary on the social scene. âTangerine! I wouldnât have tangerine curtains if you paid me. And look at that camel-hair coat. Makes him look like a bookie.â Haircuts were a dangerous area: if Dad had his cut too short he was thought to look âright commonâ; cafés, too, particularly those doing too much fried stuff but omitting to serve toasted teacakes. These days shell suits would undoubtedly be condemned, as would walking down the street drinking from a can, and it would do as a definition of whatâs gone wrong with England in the last twenty years that itâs got more common.
Such fastidious deprecations were invariably made privately and to each other, my parents too timid to think their views worth broadcasting or that they might be shared with anyone else, still less meet with general agreement; this reticence helping to reinforce the notion that we were a peculiar family and somehow set apart. Cheerful, rumbustious even within the security of the home, off their home ground they were shy and easily intimidated; there was an absence of swagger and they never, unlike my motherâs self-confident sisters, âhad a lot offâ. So when they stigmatised ostentatious behaviour as common it reaffirmed their natural preference not to want to attract attention and to get by unnoticed; they knew what they took to be their place, and kept to it.
Wanting to go unnoticed was what Mamâs depression was about. Pressed to define why it was she found the village intimidating, she said,