thing is that soon after you saw me I became harder up. My financial state was described by a friend as âstone broke.â I donât approve of slang, mind you, but such was my condition. But suppose we go in; there might be other people who would like to dineâitâs a human weakness, Salisbury.â
âCertainly; come along. I was wondering as I walked down whether the corner table were taken. It has a velvet back you know.â
âI know the spot; itâs vacant. Yes, as I was saying, I became even harder up.â
âWhat did you do then?â asked Salisbury, disposing of his hat, and settling down in the corner of the seat, with a glance of fond anticipation at the menu .
âWhat did I do? Why, I sat down and reflected. I had a good classical education, and a positive distaste for business of any kind: that was the capital with which I faced the world. Do you know, I have heard people describe olives as nasty! What lamentable Philistinism! I have often thought, Salisbury, that I could write genuine poetry under the influence of olives and red wine. Let us have Chianti; it may not be very good, but the flasks are simply charming.â
âIt is pretty good here. We may as well have a big flask.â
âVery good. I reflected, then, on my want of prospects, and I determined to embark in literature.â
âReally; that was strange. You seem in pretty comfortable circumstances, though.â
âThough! What a satire upon a noble profession. I am afraid, Salisbury, you havenât a proper idea of the dignity of an artist. You see me sitting at my deskâor at least you can see me if you care to callâwith pen and ink, and simple nothingness before me, and if you come again in a few hours you will (in all probability) find a creation!â
âYes, quite so. I had an idea that literature was not remunerative.â
âYou are mistaken; its rewards are great. I may mention, by the way, that shortly after you saw me I succeeded to a small income. An uncle died, and proved unexpectedly generous.â
âAh, I see. That must have been convenient.â
âIt was pleasantâundeniably pleasant. I have always considered it in the light of an endowment of my researches. I told you I was a man of letters; it would, perhaps, be more correct to describe myself as a man of science.â
âDear me, Dyson, you have really changed very much in the last few years. I had a notion, donât you know, that you were a sort of idler about town, the kind of man one might meet on the north side of Piccadilly every day from May to July.â
âExactly. I was even then forming myself, though all unconsciously. You know my poor father could not afford to send me to the University. I used to grumble in my ignorance at not having completed my education. That was the folly of youth, Salisbury; my University was Piccadilly. There I began to study the great science which still occupies me.â
âWhat science do you mean?â
âThe science of the great city; the physiology of London; literally and metaphysically the greatest subject that the mind of man can conceive. What an admirable salmi this is; undoubtedly the final end of the pheasant. Yet I feel sometimes positively overwhelmed with the thought of the vastness and complexity of London. Paris a man may get to understand thoroughly with a reasonable amount of study; but London is always a mystery. In Paris you may say: âHere live the actresses, here the Bohemians, and the Ratés â ; 1 but it is different in London. You may point out a street, correctly enough, as the abode of washerwomen; but, in that second floor, a man may be studying Chaldee roots, and in the garret over the way a forgotten artist is dying by inches.â
âI see you are Dyson, unchanged and unchangeable,â said Salisbury, slowly sipping his Chianti. âI think you are misled by a too fervid