He was the youngest person present, a representative from Marissa, very enthusiastic. He was fair-skinned and blond, and he always reminded me of a spring lamb, dashing off in all directions, shaking his tail with enthusiasm. âAnd it doesnât stop people debating about religion. There are people born since the Relocation who donât believe in it. And there are Ikarians in Amazonia whoâll argue with Porphyry to his face that they understand what he is and what that means better than he does.â
âCall them followers of the New Concordance, not Ikarians,â I said, wearily, in advance of the forest of hands raised by Ikarian senators. âYou know that, Halius.â
Halius nodded in the direction of the Ikarians. âApologies,â he said. Of course, everyone called them Ikarians all the time and they knew it. They believed in a strange syncretic version of Christianity which had been invented by Ikaros. After Ikaros became a god (or, according to them, an angel, though do not ask an Ikarian what the difference is unless you have a lot of spare time), they took this as proof of his theories. Older people say the New Concordance has changed a lot since Ikarosâs apotheosis.
Dad was asking for permission to speak, and I granted it, relieved. âEven if some people do believe when theyâve seen the proof, itâs likely that most people wonât,â Dad said. âAthene said it could block off other paths to enlightenment. But it would only do that if everyone knew and believed it. And they wouldnât. They might read accounts of Phaedrus and the volcanoes, or the bodies of the Children disappearing at death, and so on, but they would think other people had been fooled. Itâs only a problem for people who actually come here and see incontrovertible evidence, and that will only be a few people. Nobody else would have proof.â
Androkles raised a hand to be recognized, and I nodded to him. He was a bearded man about my own age, from Sokratea. His son Xanthus was one of Alkippeâs playmates.
âI havenât thought about this much before,â he began. âBut why are we obeying the gods in this? Telling the truth, and proving it with rigorous philosophy and evidence, seems to me better than lying by misdirection. Iâd like to hear from our own gods on this, from Pytheas and his children, to hear their arguments. There may be good reasons for it, but I want to hear them. I see no inherent reason why we should follow the dictates of Zeus merely because he issued them. We know the gods arenât inherently good. Or wise.â
âThey could smite us with lightning or turn us into flies,â Diotima pointed out.
âThatâs a terrible reason to obey them, out of fear of their bad temper,â Androkles replied without hesitation.
âThey do know more than we do,â Dad said. âThey have an inherently wider perspective.â
âGood! Then let them come here and make their points,â Androkles said. âLetâs hear the explanation for why we should keep the truth from wider humanity, and see whether we agree. And if they turn this Chamber into a buzzing cloud of flies, then weâll know they didnât have a good argument, like Athene at the Last Debate.â
âIn Sokratea you might think itâs better to be metamorphosed into an insect than lose an argument, but we donât all agree,â Dad said. There was a laugh.
âHave you finished?â I asked Androkles.
âI only want to say that the fact you have a plan formulated way back in the consulship of Maia and Klio that doesnât mean we should abjectly follow it without re-examination.â
And that was Sokratea all over. They spent so much time re-examining everything it was a wonder they ever got anything done at all.
âWhy isnât Pytheas here?â Diotima asked.
âPytheas died this afternoon,â I said.
Christina Malala u Lamb Yousafzai