foyer with flowers and wreaths and things. Then weâd pass into another room, a kind of chapel, with pews for people to sit and a raised area for people to speak. And we might wait there for a few minutes. And they might bring us coffee. Then weâd move along into this back room and thatâs where theyâd have the coffins. The bodies would all be neatly dressed and they would wheel Mary Martin over and I would look down at her, lying in this pink-padded coffin, and nod, and that would be it. I kept running this scenario through my head. The foyer, the chapel, the coffee.â
âWhatâs that theory of Malrauxâs? The assimilation of death?â
âYes, the assimilation of death. The adjustments one makes, tries to make. Thatâs what I must have been up to,â Rodgers said. For a moment he saw Connie, saw her as she had appeared when he entered her study, lying under a blanket, her face set in the wax of motionless blood.
âHow well did you know the student?â Ken said.
Rodgers shook his head and steadied his hands on the edge of the table. He wanted more wine but worried that he would spill. âMary Martin? Oh, I barely knew her at all. She was a quiet girl. Quiet. She looked a bit like that actress, the one in
Love Story.
Pretty. Dark hair. But quiet.â
The conversation in the other room hit a lull. There was just the occasional snap of the fire that his son had built earlier. Rodgers had forgotten how to open the flue, and suffered some gentle teasing over this. He listened, now, to the fire, and sat back and stared at the orange shadows cast along the doorway between the two rooms.
Mary Martin had spoken just once in his class. But he was alarmed to find the memory of this incident still very much alive. Rodgers had been lecturing on the Ik, an African tribe celebrated among cultural anthropologists for their meager standards of community. Mary Martin was in the back row, where she customarily sat. Gradually, as if with great effort, her pale face took on a disturbed animation.
âYou mean they just leave one another to die?â she demanded.
âOftentimes, yes.â
âEven a relative, or a friend?â
âIâm afraid so.â
Mary Martin shook her head and glared at him, as if he were somehow responsible for the Ikâs behavior.
Rodgers tried to soften his approach: âIt is true that the Ik represent an extreme, an affront to our conception of compassion. But every culture operates according to what Mead referred to as a concentricity of love. We all make decisions about whom we can afford to care for. In essence, we choose who to love. We do this every day, without even thinking about it. We might feel bad for aperson, but that doesnât mean we choose to take care of him, to love him. We might pass by him every day without a thought. If any of you have been to Mexico, for instance, or India, you know it is impossible to move about without beggars asking for help, people who are in real need.â
âBut thatâs different,â a second student said. âThis tribe youâre talking aboutââ
âThe Ik.â
âYeah, the Ik. They leave their own relatives to die. Parents leave their
kids.
â
âIn some cases, yes. I know itâs disturbing. But this is how they must lead their lives. They live in an extremely harsh environment and must make harsh decisions as to whom they can afford to love. Sometimes a father or mother decides there is only enough food for the two of them, and not for the children. Or they decide that a child is too sick to care for and, yes, they are left behind. But this is not cruelty. Weakness, perhaps. But not cruelty.â
âYouâre saying itâs not cruel to leave a kid like that?â
âNo. What Iâm saying is that the Ik, all of us, really, we possess only a finite amount of love, a finite amount of the internal resources by which we