âI donât see that itâs vital, but it at once confirms the fact that Lord Bygrave was extremely agitated or in a most unusual hurry. He was the most leisurely of men in his actions as a rule; for an eight oâclock breakfast he would rise at six. Still I repeat that he always returned his toilet articles to his dressing-case every time after using them when he stayed in an hotel. It was merely an idiosyncrasy: I donât even remember whether he had a reason for it. However, in this instance it doesnât matter, for I think we can take it for granted that he hadnât shaved if Standish is so positive about it.â
âNow, Miss Standish, did you see him with a pipe in his mouth on the morning of his disappearance?â asked the inspector.
âGood, Heather, good. Youâve forestalled me in the question,â interrupted Vereker.
âNo. He asked for a cigar after breakfast, but after looking at the various brands we stock he decided not to smoke at all. He used the words: âI think Iâll give it a miss this morning.â Whether he changed his mind before he left and lit a pipe I canât very well say, because I was too busy with my work to take any further notice of his lordship.â
Inspector Heather looked at Vereker. âWell, that almost confirms the point that Lord Bygrave smoked a pipe before retiring on the previous night.â
âAnd it fits in with what one would surmise,â added Vereker. âWe have come to the conclusion that Lord Bygrave was in the morning either in a desperate hurry or mentally agitated. Knowing him, I am inclined to think the latter. On the previous night he had events in perspective, so to speak, at some distance. He could smoke and ponder over them with comparative calmness even though they were swiftly approaching. There was nothing else to do.â
âJust so,â nodded the inspector.
âWhat kind of clothes was Lord Bygrave wearing? Can you remember whether they were light or dark?â asked Vereker suddenly.
âA dark tweed suit, sir.â
âGood, thatâs something; but it makes matters more mysterious.â
âI canât follow you,â smiled the inspector. âThe colour of a manâs clothes matters little before a catastrophe,â and he courteously signified to Mary Standish that his cross-examination of her was at an end.
She at once left the room. A slight colour had mounted to her cheeks under the questions of the officer from Scotland Yard, and she seemed relieved to find that her cross-examination had for the time being come to an end.
âThereâs something in her manner that instinctively tells me that she is not quite at her ease under the probe,â remarked Vereker after the girlâs departure. âI am very sensitive to these extremely delicate nuances, so to speak, in a womanâs behaviour. Did you notice it, inspector?â
âNo, I noticed nothing of the sort, Mr. Vereker. Most women are nervous under a fire of questions from a police officer.â
âDoubtless youâre right, inspector. Iâm glad, however, she remembered that Bygrave was wearing a dark suit on arrival at the inn on the Friday night. Yet the business puzzles meâit seems to be so meaningless.â
âI donât grip your line of thought. How does the fact that Lord Bygrave was wearing a dark suit puzzle you?â
âIt proves that he didnât change his clothes while he was at the inn, for the only other suit he had brought was a light-coloured one. Now, when I found that he had detached this bunch of keys from his trousers and flung them into his kit-bag, I came to the conclusion that he had changed, for otherwise I saw no reason for his detaching them. That he detached them is an incontrovertible fact; and, as it is an unusual action to detach a key chain from oneâs trousers unless preparatory to changing oneâs suit, it gives
Charna Halpern, Del Close, Kim Johnson