somethingâs around.â âA factor? A context?â âI have a contact in these dinners,â Iles said. âI get special whispers. You might have given up entirely on the occasions. Not I, not entirely. Abandonment of a project is not my style.â
âOh. Are you close to one of the waitresses, sir, close in your style of being close â which might bring special whispers?â
âIâm given excellent feedback.â
âNice.â
âBy means of this contact I have an overview.â
âI believe some of them are very OK.â
âWho?â
âThe waitresses. OK in the way you like.â
âAnd which way is that, Harpur?â
âChirpy. Forthcoming. Game for merrymaking etcetera. They wear greenish Nell Gwyn costumes at the medieval banquets, donât they?â
âNell Gwyn wasnât medieval, you dull sod.â
âHer name has come down through the centuries.â
âMy source reports an exceptionally happy and convivial Agincourt dinner.â
âAh.â
âThatâs sinister. Iâm uneasy, Col.â
âRalph and Manse have seen off a lot of competition, mostly East European. Possibly they had rowdiness from their back benchers at previous meetings, including racism, which Ember is quite a bit against and believes should be applied only very selectively. This time, things would all have been serene and pleasant.â
âWell, of course, youâd have a dull, limited, unimaginative formula explanation for their apparent contentment and good spirits. I have to see beyond that. I want you to think of me as like those youthful locals in South Sea tourist resorts who will dive into the sea and bring up from its considerable depths coins that have been flung in by spectating visitors.â
âExactly as I always do think of you, sir.â
âThe surface is an invitation to me. I am not content with it, as its self â mere surface. An invitation to look beneath. I need to see what is hidden.â
âWhat is ?â
âAs ever, thereâs a surface amity between Ralph and Manse Shale. What does it conceal, Col?â
âYouâll have an answer to that.â
âI do believe in the standard routines of basic detective work â the kind of thing you so thoroughly, even commendably, represent, Col, in your tidy fashion, but . . . sources, Col.â
âTrue.â
âWe are nothing, nowhere, without a source.â
â Are you satisfying one of the waitresses, sir? And sheâs grateful â as she damn well should be â and gives you tipoffs in return? Youâre not one to mind being mentioned in the Agincourt kitchens as a lover boy with special requirements. People are very understanding these days about kinks.â
âWhat do I mean by âfactorsâ, Col? By âcontext, as applied to the ShaleâEmber cartelâ?â
âSome people, when they talk to me about you, say, âMr Iles is one for factors, not mere facts. And context. Hence gold leaf on his cap.ââ
âWhich people?â
âIt would add up to more than quite a few, in my opinion.â
âHow many more?â
ââIn depthâ. This is another term theyâll use when talking of your approach. Perhaps theyâve spotted your resemblance to the South Seas boy divers. Theyâll refer to your âin depthâ methods and outlook. I think they mean it well, on the whole. âIn depthâ links up with âfactorsâ and âcontextâ. The same ballpark.â
âYou discuss me, do you, Harpur?â
âMany regard you as a considerable topic, sir. Theyâre used to ordinary folk such as their spouses or newsagents or chartered surveyors and then you come along, and very few would say youâre ordinary in the least. Probably.â
âWhich very fucking few?â
âStatistically almost