meant to ask about the missing girl, but as soon as the meeting had broken up, Trista had jumped in, demanding to hear about Dulcieâs meeting with her adviser. With one thing and another â mostly, Tristaâs righteous anger on her friendâs part â she ended up talking about her thesis topic. Or what would be her thesis topic if she ever did end up writing it.
Trista had been a friend for long enough to know about Dulcieâs research, including her breakthrough with The Ravages. Walking toward the Yard, Dulcie summed up her theory about the workâs anonymous author. âAnd I think thatâs a big deal. A huge deal. He says Iâm wasting my time, but think about it. The Ravages was pubbed in â91 or â92, latest. And Iâve found a score of other essays that I am pretty sure are hers from the years before and for about two years after: sheâs got some very distinctive catchphrases. These appear pretty steadily going up to 1794, and then â nothing. What, did she just disappear?â
Trista bit her lip. âCould have, though. Couldnât she? We wouldnât know. I mean, she published anonymously, right?â
âShe published anonymously, and we donât know her name. But nobody writes â or gets a book published â in a vacuum. People have reasons for not using their names, maybe this woman especially. But after her death?â Dulcie shook her head. âPeople would talk about it. Thereâd have been a notice of some kind.â
âIf only this had all happened a hundred years later â youâd have been golden, Dulce.â As a Victorian, Trista had an easier time with research. âMy people saved everything.â
âBut then there might not have been anything left for me to discover.â No matter what the challenges were, Dulcie wouldnât trade. âAnd, I mean, itâs not like weâre talking pre-Revolution. Nobody was burning papers, not usually. Unless, I donât know, they were seen as a threat for some reason.â She paused; her train of thought followed the hypothetical pages. A flick of a tail â silver gray, probably another squirrel â brought her back. âAnyway, my author writes these essays, and then, for some reason, she gives up on them. Maybe theyâre not having any effect. So she writes The Ravages . Then a few more essays, but bolder. Like, sheâs really sick of people not getting it. For a strong woman, the 1790s were not an easy time.â
âWollstonecraft.â Trista didnât have to say more.
âYes, but these days everyone looks at the Rights of Woman like it was some marvelous piece of writing. Which it is,â Dulcie added quickly. âBut it wasnât entirely original. There was so much going on then. The Romantics were coming in. Science. Industrialization. Womenâs rights were just one more cause â and not a popular one. I mean, when did women get the vote?â
Trista started to answer, but Dulcie kept talking.
âWhat I mean is, we tend to look at that era with feminist hindsight. To be an actual independent woman back then, a woman writing about these new ideas, must have been hard. Dangerous, even. And so hereâs my author, speaking out â and suddenly, nothing.â She stopped short, and Trista turned.
âWhat?â Trista waited.
âOh, dear Goddess, Chris was right.â Dulcie smiled. âHe didnât mean to be, but he was.â
Trista looked at her, not even sure what to ask.
âMy author? The woman who used her so-called radical theories to bring The Ravages of Umbria to life?â Dulcie posed the question for her. âThere is one good reason she might have disappeared without notice. One thing her family would not have wanted known. She really might have been murdered.â
SIX
T rista might have been more sympathetic than Chelowski had been, but not by much. By the