told Sean in answer to his question, âbut Tally Rand has been your basic brick wallâat least up until this morning.â
âFirst things first. Does Abbey have grounds for annulment?â
âFor sure. She told me she was sky-high on primo grass when she and Tally exchanged vows. Ergo lack of capacity for informed consent, ergo invalid marriage in the eyes of the Church.â
I gave this answer pretty confidently for an attorney who knows literally nothing about canon law. Trust me, you wonât find a class on that at Harvard Law School. Fortunately, one of my brothers is a priest, and he knew at least one thing about canon law: the telephone number for the archdiocesan chancery. The helpful young woman I tracked down there was happy to share.
âTally denies that Abbey was baked at the wedding?â Sean asked.
âTally is keeping his cards close to his vest. His official position is that the marriage was a genuine union of committed love et cetera , and as a proud non-believer he doesnât intend to play along with what he calls âthe hypocritical charade of Catholic divorce.ââ
âA âunion of loveâ that didnât last much longer than a politicianâs campaign promise and ended in a quickie divorce?â Sean seemed genuinely indignant as he put his gesticulating right hand gently on my elbow. âThatâs unmitigatedâ¦nonsense.â
âI agree.â I smiled at Seanâs hasty substitution of ânonsenseâ for the more colorful term weâd both had in mind. Old-school gentlemen donât use words like âbullshitâ in front of ladies.
âSo whoever makes the decision will believe Abbey instead of him, right?â
âI expect so. Not really the point, though.â
âWhat is the point, then?â
âWith Tallyâs cooperation, the annulment process will take six months, maybe eight. If he chooses to contest it, the annulment could take six years to get through, complete with appeals to Rome, whether his position has merit or not.â
âOuch,â Sean said. âOuch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch.â
âYeah.â I finished the veggie-wrap and slowed my pace long enough to stow deli paper in a proper receptacle.
âAny chance of a making a crack in that brick wall?â
âUntil this morning I would have said no.â I stopped, which made Sean stop, and I caught both of his eyes in my gaze so that heâd know my next words were important. âBut at nine sharp Tally called me and said he wanted to talk to you personally about an unrelated matter.â
âNamely?â
âHe didnât say.â
Sean looked to his right and his left, which is one of his ways of thinking, then started walking again. I fell into pace beside him.
âHow do you feel about the direct contact idea?â he asked.
âI donât have any problem with it. You eat guys like him for breakfast. You donât need a lawyer running interference for you. Besides, Iâm dealing with Tally on an unrelated case. If I demand that he go through me on anything relating to you, he might think he could get me to take my eye off the ball by playing one case off against the other â
âProbably right about both of those.â
âNine to one, though, this is a shakedown.â
âIt wonât be the first one Iâve ever dealt with if it is.â
âI know,â I said. âBut if he does put extortion on the table, we might be able to turn it around and use it against him.â
âBite him in the fanny with his own blessed teeth!â Sean flashed me a mega-watt beam. âI love that idea! Iâll call you as soon as Iâve talked to him.â
We both stopped now, because we were about to head in opposite directions. The twenty-thousand-a-year retainer that Sean pays me helps cover my rent, but in Pittsburgh solo start-up law practices